Controlling Organized Crime Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Controlling Organized Crime - Essay Example Control of organized crime is one of the most difficult police functions. Organized crime is defined as illegal activity aimed to generate a money profit with the help of illegal methods and activities. Organized crime is centralized activity based on strict authority and hierarchical structure of the enterprise. Abadinsky (20090 underlines that small countries with weak military government are the main producers of illicit drugs. Criminality is linked to the systemic violence and corruptive categories, as is their related criminal support system, which focuses on acquiring, securing, laundering, and safely guarding money and getting and preserving positions of power. Organized crime does not end with these more sensational and individual acts of depriving, hurting, maiming, and destroying. Even the "benign" repatriation of criminals assets through illegal cash laundering-whether this entails investment in lawful enterprise or disbursement to cover business debts in the underground e conomy-adds to criminality. Beyond that, criminal leaders corrupt the state or political leaders who run it in order to improve goods movement and access to intelligence, protect persons and property, allow for easier repatriation of financial resources, and build respectability through political influence (Lunde, 2006). Control of organized crime requires international cooperation and interaction between the First and the Third world countries. Allowing for the organized crime groups, more decentralized and less prone to syndication and violence, in many isolated geographical areas there is more finance to be made in illegal drugs and human trafficking than in any other available product or service, despite the risk and loss factors associated with an illegal drug trade. Drug money buys the peasant in Burma a new quality of life, one to be defended at all costs. On the other hand, it also provides the wherewithal for some social groups to prosecute political demands). Both political leaders and major drug traffickers in cocaine and heroin are world-class criminal leaders deprive, hurt, maim, and destroy out of business necessity or political goal. Most individuals consider this to be criminal, and much of the criminality is funded by financial assets (Abadinsky, 2009). Experience bred in conflict ha s honed control and discipline among criminal organizations worldwide. The new criminal methods, supported by the state, are much more sophisticated than the old ones of the mafia. One international critic admits that international drug traffickers have become the "global mafia," a new monolithic threat able of invoking fears such as those stirred up by East-West rhetoric about communism and capitalism (Abadinsky, 2009). Conspiracies whose combined intelligence, firepower, and will for violence exceed the capacity of some states to restrain or counter them. Such solutions create a safe, near foolproof way needing to launder vast quantities of financial reso

Pateriarchy and Paternalism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Pateriarchy and Paternalism - Essay Example However, by the end of the American Revolution, most states in northern America had already done away with the practice, but in southern states, the institution of slavery was flourishing especially in the large plantations that formed the major economic mainstay of the regions (Allport, 1954, p41). In this respect, Southern states supported slavery while the northern states opposed the practice, resulting to the civil war that was eventually won by the Northern side. For long periods, historians and social researchers have delved on how the slaves related with their masters to ensure that they coexisted peacefully without undue conflicts in such a harsh and dehumanizing working environment. This paper discusses similarities between paternalism and patriarchy in context with slavery practice in the United States. Before discussing the similarities and differences between paternalism and patriarchy, it is important to consider the demographic composition of slaves in both the southern and northern parts of the country and then establish their working conditions. According to Allport (1954, p 47) a slave was a property of a master purchased to provide free and forced labor to the master in the plantations and at homes. Southern states in America and the Caribbean relied heavily on agriculture and large plantations of crops such as sugarcane and tobacco required intensive human labor. To ensure that slaves remained productive at their place of work, the white masters first applied patriarchy during the early periods of slavery and later adopted paternalism in 18th century (Oakes, 2010, 567) Patriarchy was a strict code that emphasized on obedience, discipline, control and severe punishment of the slaves towards their masters (Oakes, 2010, p573). However, patriarchy provided the slaves with protection, guardianship and reciprocal obligation. According to Altemeyer (1988, p 26), patriarchy defined the image of the slave owner and it set the standards of judging slav eholding among the white farmers. The transformation from patriarchy to paternalism in the 18th century was enhanced by the benevolent inclination of the slave-owners towards their black slaves. Consequently, the masters began expecting similar treatment from the slaves and their outlook towards the slaves became more sentimental (Oakes, 2010, p 575). In this regard, the masters tried to create the image of happy and contended slaves, who worked to get protection from their masters. In response to patriarchy, many slaves rebelled against their masters in attempts to resist the work and the harsh treatment. The slaves resisted by feigning sickness, sabotaging, stealing from the masters, arson, destroying tools, mistreating animals among other behaviors. Their resistance was mainly collective, structured to undermine the system in order to facilitate change or validate escape from slavery (Altemeyer, 1988, p 39). This occasionally resulted to revolts that were driven by a common sense of victimization. However, the revolts were not intended to change the structure or the balance of power but provided avenue for expression or execution of retribution directed at an individual but not on the larger system of power (Oakes, 2010, p 583). In this regard, the slaves’ revolts were not revolutionary since they lacked collective